FARI DESIGN

Research Insights

To understand user behavior, I synthesized patterns from secondary research and AI-assisted analysis.

The findings are indicative and were used to guide product decisions, rather than as precise quantitative data.

Insights are based on synthesized patterns and used to guide product decisions.

Users don't know why they get rejected

Lack of feedback makes it difficult to improve applications.

Customization is expected but inefficient

Tailoring CVs takes time and often feels unclear.

Users want guidance, not automation

People prefer support instead of full automation.

Time investment is high with low return

Users spend hours applying without clear outcomes.

User Personas

Anna Müller

Marketing Manager

Munich, Germany

32 years old

Goals

Get more interview invitations

Apply efficiently

Improve CV quality

Frustrations

Doesn't know what recruiters expect

Spends too much time customizing CVs

Receives little feedback

Behaviors

Reuses CV with small edits

Applies to multiple jobs in batches

Needs

Clear feedback

Guidance, not automation

Faster workflow

"I just want to know what I'm missing instead of guessing every time."

Daniel Schneider

Former Sales Associate → UX Design

Berlin, Germany

28 years old

Goals

Successfully switch careers

Present transferable skills clearly

Stand out despite non-traditional background

Frustrations

"My experience doesn't match job descriptions directly."

"I don't know how to reframe my past roles."

"I get rejected without understanding why."

Behaviors

Frequently rewrites CV

Uses online templates and advice

Experiments with wording but feels unsure

Needs

Help translating experience into relevant skills

Suggestions for wording and positioning

Confidence that the CV fits the role

"I feel like I have the skills, but I don't know how to show it."

Behavioral Patterns

Frequency based on qualitative scale (1 = Rarely, 5 = Very Common)

User CV Behavior Patterns

0

1

2

3

4

5

Reuse single CV

Fully customized

CV

Time Spent per Job Application

0

1

2

3

4

5

Less than 30

minutes

1–2 hours

More than 2 hours

Preferred Level of Assistance

0

1

2

3

4

5

Guided AI

assistance

Full automation

No support

Translating Insights into Product Direction

1

Reduce friction in CV customization

Simplify editing instead of rebuilding CVs

2

Provide clear, actionable feedback

Match score and improvement suggestions

3

Keep users in control

Allow accepting/rejecting AI suggestions

4

Save time without removing clarity

Guided step-by-step workflow

Opportunity

Current tools either analyze CVs or generate them. This solution focuses on a guided approach—helping users understand and improve their applications while staying in control.

FARI DESIGN

Research Insights

To understand user behavior, I synthesized patterns from secondary research and AI-assisted analysis.

The findings are indicative and were used to guide product decisions, rather than as precise quantitative data.

Insights are based on synthesized patterns and used to guide product decisions.

Users don't know why they get rejected

Lack of feedback makes it difficult to improve applications.

Customization is expected but inefficient

Tailoring CVs takes time and often feels unclear.

Users want guidance, not automation

People prefer support instead of full automation.

Time investment is high with low return

Users spend hours applying without clear outcomes.

User Personas

Anna Müller

Marketing Manager

Munich, Germany

32 years old

Goals

Get more interview invitations

Apply efficiently

Improve CV quality

Frustrations

Doesn't know what recruiters expect

Spends too much time customizing CVs

Receives little feedback

Behaviors

Reuses CV with small edits

Applies to multiple jobs in batches

Needs

Clear feedback

Guidance, not automation

Faster workflow

"I just want to know what I'm missing instead of guessing every time."

Daniel Schneider

Former Sales Associate → UX Design

Berlin, Germany

28 years old

Goals

Successfully switch careers

Present transferable skills clearly

Stand out despite non-traditional background

Frustrations

"My experience doesn't match job descriptions directly."

"I don't know how to reframe my past roles."

"I get rejected without understanding why."

Behaviors

Frequently rewrites CV

Uses online templates and advice

Experiments with wording but feels unsure

Needs

Help translating experience into relevant skills

Suggestions for wording and positioning

Confidence that the CV fits the role

"I feel like I have the skills, but I don't know how to show it."

Behavioral Patterns

Frequency based on qualitative scale (1 = Rarely, 5 = Very Common)

User CV Behavior Patterns

0

1

2

3

4

5

Reuse single CV

Fully customized

CV

Time Spent per Job Application

0

1

2

3

4

5

Less than 30

minutes

1–2 hours

More than 2 hours

Preferred Level of Assistance

0

1

2

3

4

5

Guided AI

assistance

Full automation

No support

Translating Insights into Product Direction

1

Reduce friction in CV customization

Simplify editing instead of rebuilding CVs

2

Provide clear, actionable feedback

Match score and improvement suggestions

3

Keep users in control

Allow accepting/rejecting AI suggestions

4

Save time without removing clarity

Guided step-by-step workflow

Opportunity

Current tools either analyze CVs or generate them. This solution focuses on a guided approach—helping users understand and improve their applications while staying in control.